
I can’t say I am surprised that The New Yorker chose to depict Barack Obama as a flag-burning Muslim. Even if the editor David Remnick thinks its satire the message goes over folk’s head. I was watching a CNN report on the elections on Friday where a reporter went around to various cities to take the pulse of its citizens about the candidates. His last stop left Campbell Brown, the reporter and the audience stunned into silence. Here’s what happened: The reporter asked the older white woman why has a life-long Democrat she’s decided to vote for McCain. Her reply was “Because I think he’s a Muslim.” The jaw-dropping statement came from her male friend who said that he doesn’t think a black man could make change. That is, unless he has a cup in his hand.
This statement just goes to show how deep racism runs in this country (and I believe we are just touching the tip of the iceberg). But whether the staff of The New Yorker know it or not they’ve started a different kind of storm when it comes to Michelle Obama.
We already know that the presumptive nominee’s wife is disliked because she is a strong, smart, beautiful and opinionated sister. But when people of all backgrounds hear her speak, they actually like her. And there is no question as to her American roots. So now the type of American she is is suddenly at issue. By giving her an afro and an Ak-47 and dressing her in fatigues we’re suddenly reminded of Angela Davis and Assata Shakur (aka JoAnne Chesimard). Yes, fist-waving, power to the people, Black Panthers who were on the FBI’s Most Wanted list. This may be just as frightening to the unenlightened then the possibility of Barack being a Muslim.
We were already tired of hearing Michelle being depicted as an angry black woman. This depiction takes that accusation to new heights, suggesting that she may be violent too. Now people will be even more afraid of her. This is simply ridiculous and insulting. But I fear this is just the beginning. We’ve got a little under four months to go in this Presidential campaign. The race deck is just being shuffled and we better get ready for how ugly America decides to play this hand.




July 15th, 2008 at 6:40 pm
We have to be strong, and continue on the path (as we always have been–it’s how we reached this point in history)because the New Yorker cover is most likely kindergarten–and we have the GRE’s coming!!
But we will not be swiftboated–we will speak up and out!!!
V&D
July 15th, 2008 at 8:49 pm
You are absolutely right, it is time for cram for the hard stuff.
July 16th, 2008 at 2:26 pm
I was also surprised that the thing the New Yorker chose to be conservative about was her skin color–portraying her with very fair skin.
Like you said, I too felt like most people do favor Michele Obama. But, have you read the results of the the NY Times poll (released today) on race relations/campaign? According to the poll, only 24% of white voters view Michelle Obama favorably. How odd.
July 16th, 2008 at 10:39 pm
I saw that, I am often skeptical about these polls. Very often the number of people is a small representative sample so we can’t put too much stock in them. Actually those were the same polls that had Hillary winning by a landslide. That said, I do think there is a great disparity when it comes to education and age that explains the schism between being progressive or backwards when it comes to race.
November 3rd, 2008 at 3:09 pm
so black people don’t get satire?